After raising suspicions of political expediency by suddenly talking about his father’s Mexican birthplace, Mitt Romney was put on the spot in a Spanish-language interview. And had to acknowledge it would be a stretch to claim Latino heritage. Still, he waited until the Florida primary to mention his father’s background.

Q: “Your father was born in Mexico. Are you a Mexican-American? Could you be the first Hispanic president?”

Romney: “I would love to be able to convince people of that, particularly in a Florida primary” (laughing). But I think that might be disingenuous on my part…..He [George Romney] was born of U.S. citizens who were living in Mexico at the time. He never spoke Spanish, nor did his parents. So I can’t claim that honor…. I don’t think people would think I was being honest with them if I said I was Mexican-American.”

Univision interview (1/25)

 

21 Responses to No Mex-Mitt After All

  1. Flatus, I enjoyed your gambling “toke” explainer on carried interest. And by the way Mitt himself said ALL of his income comes this way, putting an end to the false claim that he also had paid ordinary income rates before the cap gains. (The company paid ordinary rates, but not him)

    Thumb up 0

  2. patd says:

    from taegan’s political wire today:

    A new CNN-Time poll in Florida finds Mitt Romney leading with 36%, followed by Newt Gingrich at 34%, Rick Santorum at 11% and Ron Paul at 9%.

    Key findings: “Romney leads Gingrich among female and white voters, voters over 50, and those with a college degree… Gingrich holds leads among men, Tea Party voters, self-identified conservatives — among whom he boasts a 10-point advantage — and born-again Christians. His fans also appear to be more committed than Romney’s.”

    Thumb up 0

  3. patd says:

    by the way Mitt himself said ALL of his income comes this way, putting an end to the false claim that he also had paid ordinary income rates

    craig, but what about the 300 thousand plus bucks he said he got from speechifying?

    Thumb up 0

  4. Tonyb says:

    Ping,
    Good to see you on the previous post..I enjoy reading you but wow, your party offers more of the same BUSH nonsense that got us into this mess..Romney’s answer on Afghanistan, can i scream out loud, bullshit..

    Thumb up +2

  5. Tonyb says:

    File This Under Predictable

    by Taylor Marsh

    It comes from Fox and nobody should be surprised.

    It won’t help Mitt Romney win the nomination, because he’s having so much trouble explaining himself I’m not sure anything can at this point, but it does give you an idea of the demagoguing on Romney’s wealth.

    It also is illustrative for why many Americans are sick of both political parties and their unhinged partisan warfare.

    WHO’S GREEDY? Obama Gave 1% to Charity, Romney Gave 15%

    I wrote the headline first yesterday: How Many Democratic Millionaires Pay 10% to their Church or Charity? So, needless to say I knew this was coming.

    No one can argue that the Swiss bank, Cayman account bingo slick Mitt is playing looks bad. That Newt Gingrich, a rich fat cat lobbyist and access peddler, is teeing off on it is as expected as the Democratic response.

    Let’s just not pretend Democrats don’t play the same game.

    Thumb up 0

  6. Tonyb says:

    Mitt Slams Newt with Ronald Reagan

    by Taylor Marsh
    Video

    er… I mean Romney’s Super PAC… er… Rather, the Super PAC supporting Mitt Romney that has absolutely no contact with the candidate whatsoever is slamming Newt with Ronald Reagan.

    Nate Silver reveals why. In the debates, Newt continually tries to associate himself with the Gipper:

    Over the course of the 17 debates that he has participated in during this cycle, Mr. Gingrich has used the term “Reagan” 55 times, according to debate transcripts. By comparison, the nine other Republican candidates who have participated in the debates mentioned Reagan just 51 times combined. (Rick Santorum is a distant second to Mr. Gingrich with 14 mentions.

    .)

    Thumb up 0

  7. Tonyb says:

    Blind GOP opposition helps Obama’s re-election bid
    By Joe Trippi

    And that’s the way things are in Washington with just 286 days until the general election. With Romney and Newt Gingrich brawling in primary states, the president did an effective job of setting himself apart from that type of politics. Can he be brought down? Not likely if the GOP demonstrates the stoic and blind opposition we saw Tuesday night.

    Thumb up 0

  8. patd says: craig, but what about the 300 thousand plus bucks he said he got from speechifying?

    patd, i should have said Mitt told Hannity all his BAIN income comes from cap gains at lower tax rate, he personally does not pay higher ordinary rate on any Bain income (as his supporters keep saying)

    Thumb up 0

  9. sturgeone says:

    If one were seeking to “divide america” between the 1% and the 99%…..are you really dividing america?

    Thumb up 0

  10. sturgeone says:

    that old boy romney is as goofy as a crap-house rat. and newt is even goofier.

    Thumb up 0

  11. theresa43 says:

    Craig: Cracked me up your reference of Hillary’s hair to her hair many years ago with the Tammy Wynette “moment”. I had forgotten, but your picture brought back the memories.

    Thumb up 0

  12. Jamie says:

    Shuster is subbing for Olbie again tonight and he’s doing that weird thing with his mouth again. Keep wondering if it is a physical condition he’s never mentioned or just a strange affectation of enunciation.

    Thumb up 0

  13. Jamie says:

    Announced today that Geithner doesn’t expect to return for second term if the President is re-elected.

    Thumb up 0

  14. corey says:

    This morning, a conservative friend of mine said that Obama’s SOTU speech began at 9:11 last night. She added how certain numbers have significance. I told her that Porsche also makes a model called “911″, adding that it was “scary”. My friend said, “It is, especially since 9/11 was an inside job.” I really have to wonder if people believe the things they say.

    Thumb up 0

  15. Tonyb says:

    U.S. News & World Report Op-Ed

    by Taylor Marsh

    President Obama takes his base for granted on issues like the Bush tax cuts, Plan B, and the economy -- US News

    It’s written by yours truly.

    They chose the title.

    Here’s a teaser, but it’s an exclusive for US News, so you’ll have to click the link above to get the rest. (I hope you do.)

    Here we are at the beginning of Pres. Obama’s reelection and what do we find? The Bush tax cuts that, back in 2008, candidate Obama pledged he’d fight to repeal, but which as president he extended. Considering not extending them began as his base position, three years into his first term it’s not too much to ask how Democrats allowed themselves to get twisted into this policy pretzel.

    That’s exactly where Obama’s got his Democratic and progressive base…

    On a side note, it’s interesting to find myself with an op-ed in a property owned by Mort Zuckerman. They gave me free rein and it’s the exact piece I wanted to write, so I’ve got no complaints.

    Thumb up 0

  16. xrepublican says:

    It’s been interesting to read the pong’s unwavering support for willard romney and socialist communist maoism.

    willard is busy liquidating American businesses, throwing people out of work, and then partnering with the commie government to open new slave labor factories.

    That is what constitutes rip up lican ‘success’ !

    Thumb up 0

  17. Jamie says:

    NEW THREAD

    Thumb up 0