And they’re off. Funded by wealthy donors who can give unlimited cash (made possible by the Supreme Court), Super Pacs on both sides are heavily rotating attack ads.


Airing in Colorado, Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia (cost: $7 million)
 
 

Airing in Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia (Cost: $9.7 million)

C-SPAN: A Look at Fact Checking in the 2012 Election

Florida poll: Romney 47, Obama 41

 

93 Responses to Super Pacs Unleashed

  1. Jamie says:

    Woo Hoo. Have fun today. Robert Moog’s b’day and you can play a synthesizer on the Google page.

  2. Jamie says:

    I hate the unlimited funds simply because it limits the average person’s voice since they have lost the politicians year. Even more I hate the anonymity. It’s bad enough to have unlimited bribery of those seeking election, to not know who is doing the bribing is the path to destruction.

  3. patd says:

    jamie, it’s bad even when they’re not so anonymous.

    Oklahoma oil billionaire Harold Hamm didn’t wait long to make a nearly $1 million donation to a group supporting Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney after he became one of Romney’s top energy advisers in March. Just weeks after Hamm joined the Romney campaign, he gave $985,000 to a pro-Romney super PAC, according to campaign reports.
    [....]

    Hamm, whose company did not return telephone calls from The Associated Press, is among a group of energy tycoons who have made lucrative donations to Restore Our Future, a super PAC supporting Romney. Unlike the others, Hamm has matched his contributions with his role personally advising Romney on energy policy — blurring the line between the campaign and the super PACs that support them but are legally barred from coordinating with candidates.

    http://www.windstream.net/news/read.php?rip_id=%3CD9UU8HC03%40news.ap.org%3E&ps=1017

  4. patd says:

    cont’d

    “Given the idea that super PACs were supposed to be independent, it seems odd when you’ve got someone working for the campaign who turns around and gives large contributions to the independent group,” said Lawrence Noble, a Washington attorney and former general counsel for the Federal Election Commission. “That’s not what most people’s idea of what independent is.”

  5. Tonyb says:

    Cory Booker, Day 3
    by Taylor Marsh

    JUST HOW DENSE is the new media elite?

    The Atlantic’s Conor Friedersdorf proves how thick today when reviewing Chris Matthews’ harangue against Cory Booker last evening. This is what Friedersdorf actually wrote today:

    If Matthews were a political operative, perhaps the code he’s defending would make sense.

    But he is a journalist.

    Stop the servers!

    Chris Matthews lost his journalist credentials in 2007-2008, during the “thrill going up my leg” primary season where he vilified Hillary Clinton at every turn and reveled in his serial political porn on the Clinton marriage, while parading every misogynist in his DC Rolodex across his Clinton hating guest roster.

    What makes matters worse is that Politico’s Dylan Byers picked it up without any analysis that computes the history of Chris Matthews, and Byer’s covers media.

  6. Blonde Wino says:

    The Super PACS are immoral — in a great country like the US of AA, the money should be going to feed and educate the citizens…obscene amount of money for advertising? Disgusting. Shame on Supreme Justice Roberts.

  7. Jamie says:

    Last night Rachel highlighted the fact that Sununu went off the GOP reservation in almost exactly the same way as Booker did with the Obama campaign. “I think the Bain record, as a whole, is fair game,” Sununu told reporters Tuesday. “What you have to do is an honest evaluation.”

    News stories about Sununu -- 0 vs three days non stop coverage of Booker. So much for liberal media.

  8. jace says:

    Super-pacs unleashed?

    More like the dogs of Hell unleashed. Neutral

  9. Katherine Graham Cracker says:

    Tweety -- why does anyone even care what an ffen loser he is …

    MSNBC kept the crypt dweller until the public outcry about his racism was overwhelming. Tweety will die working there …he’ll just keep dragging them down like the bigot did

  10. jace says:

    If Team Obama is not concerned about the polling number in Florida, and the fact that Scott Walker is about to win big in Wisconsin they should be.
    Both of those states should have been comfortably in the Obama column.

  11. Katherine Graham Cracker says:

    Scott Walker is going to win big? Yikes…what is the matter with the Dems in Wisconsin?

  12. whskyjack says:

    Timothy Leary -- Turn on Tune in Drop out

  13. Blonde Wino says:

    Jace…Walker will win, he has the six pac of Koch behind him while the national dems watched with their hands in their pockets.

  14. whskyjack says:

    what is the matter with the Dems in Wisconsin?

    The National Democratic party is only focused on the re-election of Obama and has no time for capacity building at the grass roots level.

    Jack

  15. whskyjack says:

    When you have a candidate with no ability vs a candidate with no ideas……… leads to six months of mud slingin.
    We are so screwed.

    Jack

  16. The Bain of Mitt’s Existence-VIDEO
    Gingrich- “I’m for capitalism, I’m for people that go in to save a company, I’m for people who take real risk. But if somebody comes in, takes all the money out of your company and leaves you bankrupt while they go off with millions…”
    Perry- “They sit there and they wait until they see a distressed company and then they swoop in and they pick the carcass clean and they fly away.”
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2fJhF6uctfM

  17. whskyjack says:

    I see Dixie love mud too

  18. jace says:

    This recall will strengthen Walker immensely, he is poised to become the new darling of conservatives everywhere.
    National Dems. sat on the wall because they were afraid to put up a fight and lose, instead they just forfeited.

  19. whskyjack says:

  20. AND- To folks who see President Obama as a ‘moderate Republican’. I can see that, on many issues, there are Republicans from the past (even presidents) who did progressive things and who weren’t hellbent on destroying everything FDR and JFK and LBJ built. But that is not today’s Republican party and that is not Mitt Romney. In a different time, in a different R-Party, perhaps Romney could have been a progressive Republican, but he is not. Not only has he been pushed far to the right on issues of taxation and public investment, but he is IMMERSED in a Far Right Power structure (from Norquist to Koch) who will dominate him if elected.

    If you find yourself describing President Obama as a ‘moderate Republican’ remember, he is running against a Party of Far Right-wing Zealots out to destroy the American dream and recreate monarchy and fiefdoms for the rich! A vote for Obama today is EVEN MORE IMPORTANT than a vote for some of the Democrat heroes of the past, because, in fact, they were running against far more SANE opponents. This isn’t a game and Liberal Pride costs too much in this dangerous environment.

  21. Katherine Graham Cracker says:

    The National Democratic party is only focused on the re-election of Obama and has no time for capacity building at the grass roots level.

    Jack

    Calling Dr.Dean

  22. jace says:

    The National Democratic party is only focused on the re-election of Obama and has no time for capacity building at the grass roots level.

    Jack

    This was the same charge leveled at Bill Clinton.
    It was mostly true, and that lack of a grassroots structure and involvement made George Bush possible.

    Does history repeat itself?

  23. whskyjack says:

    Jace
    Good points.

    KGC
    Yep, As I’ve said repeatedly the Democratic party needs to remove the “president as head of the party” nonsense and elect their own leader.

    Organisationally they are stuck in the 19th century. With todays political money side stepping the party and going to super pacs the Party is irrelevant on the Presidential level. But on State and local is where the party can have influence.
    It is on the State and local level that the party is getting it butt kicked.

    Jack

  24. whskyjack says:

    Jace

    As I said , I think it is structural no matter who is president. But at least Bill clinton recognised that he needed local democrates elected and went out and campaigned for congressional candidates.(not that it did a lot of good in 94 but he worked his ass off trying) I can’t remember Obama ever doing that.

    Jack

  25. whskyjack says:

    It is not that Obama is doing anything new in regard to his fellow dems. It just seems that he has taken his indifference to a new level not seen before

    Jack

  26. jace says:

    Jack,

    Bravo three times.

    jace

  27. whskyjack says:

  28. whskyjack says:

  29. whskyjack says:

    Democratic party new theme song

  30. Jamie says:

    It really angers me that the national party isn’t supporting all the recall efforts to clean out the tea party garbage. As to the national election, I do think the President could be putting up a bigger fight, but will vote for him anyway. Romney may not be evil incarnate, but the garbage he would drag in on his coattails could bring down the country.

  31. Jamie says:

    Listening to Romney talk about education. The lies spilling from his lips are so numerous, I’ve gotten a headache just trying to keep track.

    It is the old GOP trick of passing your own guilt on to the competitor. You cannot slash budgets, increase class sizes, eliminate programs and then blame the teachers because the children aren’t getting an education.

    If children are not secure, fed, mentored, and in an encouraging environment, the best teacher is the world will have trouble saving them.

  32. whskyjack says:

    I finally got around to looking at the ads. The Obama ad works only for union democrats a group that we would assume is already going to vote for him. The fact that they feel it is neccesary to get the base on board may say a lot about this election.

    The cross roads ad is a killer ad that touches everybody’s fears and it is aimed right at the most important audience in a presidential election.

    Jack

  33. Jamie says:

    Article on the Moog Synthesizer and a how to on the Google logo

  34. Jamie says:

    What gets me about the Crossroads ad is that it is a complete “Pants On Fire” distortion specifically aimed at low information voters that you wish wouldn’t go near the polls.

  35. Blonde Wino says:

    The Teatman continues his insults…

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76673.html

  36. Jamie says:

    Colin Powell just came out in favor of gay marriage.

  37. Flatus says:

    Shame on Wisconsinites if they let the republican outsiders buy their recall election. Likewise, how is it in state Democratic interests in letting outsiders enter what is totally a state Democratic matter?

    If rank-and-file Democrats, through word-of-mouth and other in-state grassroots efforts don’t know what’s at stake, then the recall effort should fail.

    I say, let the DNC and other outsiders watch with great interest as this experiment in American Democracy unfolds. Meanwhile, the rest of us should catalog republican sins for the “Après moi,le déluge” postmortem of their ham-handed external involvement in the affairs of the Sovereign State of Wisconsin.

  38. Flatus says:

    Poor Gen Powell was so ill-used by the post-GHWB republicans.

  39. Flatus says:

    I’ll always have his back.

  40. patd says:

    …obscene amount of money for advertising

    bw, just once i would like to see an expose’ of where all this money goes, how is it divvied up, who profits while at the same time laments the state of elections, and how it impacts the news staff and their delivery. not just the investors and guys at the top, but the guys & gals in the newsroom and on the blogs.

  41. Movingon says:

    The droning of America. You can bet they will be used in Charlotte, NC during the Democratic convention especially since the anarchists who were in Chaicago said they would be protesting the convention. Besure to being your hardhats.

    http://washington.cbslocal.com/2012/05/23/groups-concerned-over-arming-of-domestic-drones/

  42. patd says:

    the bulk of the money goes to buy tv time.

    oh to return to equal time regs.

  43. patd says:

    If rank-and-file Democrats, through word-of-mouth and other in-state grassroots efforts don’t know what’s at stake, then the recall effort should fail.

    flatus, wholeheartedly agree.
    also agree about powell, a good man done wrong.

  44. Movingon says:

    Wealth has been leaving France long before Francois Hollande became the president. So the question becomes if Hollande goes through with his plan of levying a 70% tax on the “rich”, who will he tax when the smart rich who can leave France pack-up and leave. And will this provide the French with a new definition of the meaning of “rich”. Shock

  45. Jamie says:

    My son did his 20 years in the Army under Powell. The men and women who knew him as their commander practically idolize the man. What Bush and company did to him was disgusting. He did his duty and it is good to hear him speaking out now.

    I know Alma wanted him to just come home, but would have loved to see all that patriotism, honesty, and ethics in political office if only as an example to the rest of the Congress Critters who seem to have forgotten what it means to be an elected representative.

  46. Tonyb says:

    http://craigcrawford.com/2012/05/23/super-pacs-unleashed/#comment-289835

    It really angers me that the national party isn’t supporting all the recall efforts to clean out the tea party garbage.

    Jamie,
    Me too! My gosh the DNC and Dems have had so much time to take Walker down, its truly SHAMEFUL! Speaks to what today’s Dem leaders have become, weak weak and not willing to fight for anything…Wasn’t it the President who said he would put on a pair of comfortable shoes and walk with Labor in their hour of need? Ha, Obama as head of the Democratic Party won’t even insist the DNC send boatloads of money to support this re-call effort, more of the same from him…

  47. Tonyb says:


    It’s Not News that Romney Can Win
    by Taylor Marsh

    I started following Mitt Romney during the 2007-2008 primary season, writing back then that he was dangerous for Democrats. Progressives scoffed at my analysis, though they did as well when I warned them about candidate Obama back in 2007.

    But that was long before Pres. Obama decided to compromise with himself and take the economic argument so far right that it benefits Republicans across the board. Obama’s bipartisanship anti-ideological politics is why he and his campaign are fighting to keep their Bain Capital strategy against Mitt Romney alive. That his own car czar, followed by two well known African American Democrats, have followed his apolitical lead where Wall Street economics is concerned has now become the biggest threat to Pres. Obama’s reelection.

    From Politico’s Jonathan Martin:

  48. xrepublican says:

    “Super-pacs unleashed? More like the dogs of Hell unleashed.” -- Jace @ 9:37 am

    Blood and destruction shall be so in use
    And dreadful objects so familiar
    That mothers shall but smile when they behold
    Their infants quarter’d with the hands of war;
    All pity choked with custom of fell deeds:
    And Caesar’s spirit, ranging for revenge,
    With Ate by his side come hot from hell,
    Shall in these confines with a monarch’s voice
    Cry ‘Havoc,’ and let slip the dogs of war;
    That this foul deed shall smell above the earth
    With carrion men, groaning for burial.

  49. xrepublican says:

    “When you have a candidate with no ability vs a candidate with no ideas….” -Jack @ 10:17 am

    But which is which ?

  50. Tonyb says:

    http://craigcrawford.com/2012/05/23/super-pacs-unleashed/#comment-289856

    Oh X,
    You make me laugh! Oh and so true, which is which?????

  51. xrepublican says:

    Tony, graveyard laughter ?
    ( :>D))<

  52. whskyjack says:

    LOL
    Good question. I was thinking Obama=no ability and Romney= no ideas but now that you mention it…….

    Jack

  53. whskyjack says:

    specifically aimed at low information voters that you wish wouldn’t go near the polls.

    Situation normal, it always comes down to the Bozo vote.

    Jack

  54. whskyjack says:

    Not that I’m prejudice mind you, I know a lot of Bozos, I even have bozos as friends………..

  55. whskyjack says:

    I Think We’re All Bozos on This Bus

  56. whskyjack says:

    I’ve listened to a lot of stuff today that would have been a lot better if I had a joint to smoke with it.

    Jack

  57. Jamie says:

    Spitzer was off Viewpoint tonight. As a result I spent an hour laughing with the resulting tweet:

    @JohnFugelsang I think I hurt myself on your Viewpoint monologue tonight -- political terror should not be that hilarious

  58. jace says:

    Re your 7:26 pm

    For you sir.

    jace

  59. jace says:

    I’ve listened to a lot of stuff today that would have been a lot better if I had a joint to smoke with it.

    Jack

    Be careful Jack there is a lot of that going around.

    jace

  60. xrepublican says:

    The Black Book of the Admiralty, 1385 the collection of laws in French and Latin organizing the English Navy. In the ‘Ordinances of War of Richard II’:
    “Item, qe nul soit si hardy de crier havok sur peine davoir la test coupe.”

  61. xrepublican says:

    I don’t suppose that use of ‘havok’ can be found on Youtube.

  62. jace says:

    We had a Dachshund named Bozo when I was growing up. He was much smarter than the average voter. Wink

  63. xrepublican says:

    One so rarely finds the Black Book of the Admiralty performed.

  64. jace says:

    I don’t suppose that use of ‘havok’ can be found on Youtube.

    XR,

    No, but I love it when you talk dirty. Wink

  65. jace says:

    Just encountered a small problem lighting the grill.
    My hands have never been this bald. Wink

  66. jace says:

    Mitt on education.

    See Spot run.
    See Spot ride on top of the car.
    Dick and Jane will vote for me, because I like Spot. Neutral

  67. Jamie says:

    This is the man the national Democratic party won’t help throw out of office:

    Scott Walker defends David Duke

  68. jace says:

    Which of the little yellow face gizmos, denotes nervous laugh while telling big lie? I can’t seem to find it.
    A little help here.

  69. Jamie says:

    Well actually Smile

  70. Jamie says:

    Jace,

    You might find it here: Emoticons

  71. Flatus says:

    I can’t imagine what the outcome of the last world war would have been if Germany’s choice of war dog had been switched from Alsatian to Dachshund.

  72. jace says:

    Jamie,

    This is an example of oneupsmanship at it’s finest.

    Well done! Wink

  73. jace says:

    Flatus,

    Your question is a fair one. My only experience with the noble Dachshund is that you should never engage in a war of wills with one. I still love them but they are stuuuubborn!
    That said, a more loyal companion was never to be found. Wink

  74. jace says:

    We have gone from the ‘Jaws of Strife’ to the ‘dogs of war’.
    To those not familiar with us we might appear to be a rather somber and petulant group. Wink

  75. xrepublican says:

    It’s hard to believe that any Alsatian could be a nazi. They were probably crossed with spitzes and given steroids.

  76. xrepublican says:

    Yes, Jace. Let us all put on our Trail Mix sombreros.

  77. xrepublican says:

    Maybe a mix with jackals, hyenas, or neocons.

  78. jace says:

    XR,
    I have a sombrero. I really look stupid when I wear it.

    I gotta’ take a pass. Wink

  79. xrepublican says:

    Jace,

    Good luck, there’s a long waiting line.

  80. xrepublican says:

    Don’t do it out back. The cops will arrest you for innocent disposal.

  81. xrepublican says:

    Enough silliness. I’m gone to bed. ‘night all.

  82. jace says:

    XR,

    Deft advice, sleep well. Wink

  83. patd says:

    Those donors have no illusions that their money makes a tangible difference: if anything, it’s more like a drop in the lake than a drop in the bucket. But they give anyway — sometimes out of curiosity, sometimes out of custom, and sometimes out of a desire to partake in a bit of partisan warfare.

    “It made me feel like a revolutionary war mother, throwing a tin plate and a couple of cheap rings into the molten metal for the cannon balls,” said John Boyd, an Albuquerque lawyer who gave $250 to the Obama-allied Priorities USA Action in April.

    Boyd is one of a select few donors who have acted on that urge. Priorities USA Action has raised a total of $7,898,000 from individuals and corporations this cycle, according to a review of campaign finance records. Of that, only $93,895 has come from contributions of $250 or less, which means just 0.88 percent of the super PAC’s donations came from small-dollar donors.

    The breakdown for its Republican counterpart is even more pronounced. Restore Our Future, the super PAC backing presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney, has raised $55,628,000 from individuals and corporations so far this cycle. Of that, just $6,874 came in the form of contributions totaling $250 or less — just 0.012 percent of its total.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/22/super-pac-small-donors_n_1537358.html

  84. patd says:

    The controversy surrounding the Bain ad and a proposed Wright ad from a super-PAC backed by Joe Ricketts, the billionaire founder of TD Ameritrade Holding Corp. (AMTD), suggests that when “paid media” in the presidential race ventures out-of- bounds, “free media” will exact a penalty. (House and Senate races are another story.)

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-23/how-super-pacs-will-keep-the-campaign-clean.html

    “free” media?
    is that like the difference between a prostitute and a party girl or do they mean it as a call to arms as in “free willy”?

  85. Jamie says:

    I’ve decided that being unliked as children is what turns men into conservative Republicans. Reince Priebus is almost a classic example. Without considering the political differences, he seems so awkward that I actually start to feel sorry for him.

  86. jace says:

    Jamie,

    If you really liked your child you would not name him Reince. Sort of like a boy named Sue.

  87. jace says:

    Nice tune my son linked for me. Thought I’d share it.
    Have a good day all. Wink

  88. Georgia Gov. Launches Michelle-O Style Health Initiative Fight Obesity!
    OH NO! The big government Liberals have brainwashed Conservative Republican Governor Nathan Deal of Georgia! Michelle-O what have you done to Gov. Deal?
    http://thedixiedove.com/

    Gov. Deal launches childhood obesity initiative
    By Associated Press

    ATLANTA — Georgia’s governor and the state health department have launched a program aimed at addressing childhood obesity through government, philanthropic and academic efforts.

    In announcing the SHAPE program on Wednesday, Gov. Nathan Deal’s Office said Georgia has the second highest obesity rate in the country for children ages 10 to 17. Nearly 40 percent of Georgia children are considered overweight or obese.

    Georgia SHAPE features a website with a fitness directory and the initiative will also promote breastfeeding, exercise and better nutritional options for students.

    Child care programs implementing specific wellness policies and related training will earn the Governor’s Award, designating them a Georgia SHAPE-compliant facility. Schools will also be encouraged to support regulations that provide 30 minutes of daily physical activity for every student.

    http://onlineathens.com/local-news/2012-05-23/gov-deal-launches-childhood-obesity-initiative

  89. pogo says:

    Great tune, Jace. They’ve got a remarkable bass player.

    So anything of note in the pol world? I’ve had to work harder than I like lately and will have to continue to do so for a while. Last I heard Rove has come out saying there’s a narrow victory for Romney just over the horizon -- based on Romney carrying Ohio, which I think is unlikely, or a second route with him carrying Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin (talk about a long shot!!)

  90. HERE’S TO THE BANKSTERS!
    ADD ‘BANKSTERS’ FOR ‘BRITISH’…
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=50_iRIcxsz0